Students
should not have internet access freely
First I want to give a definition of the
motion. Student is a kid that still
the age of studying or learning and internet is a data that can open many application
that can help us to find somethings that we wanted for the example is google is
using an internet. So i believe this motion should fall because i had many
reason thats not supporting this motion.
The first agrument is, I disagree
because student can learn more from internet. And i believe that student can
use the internet positively. Based on school.projects.com that many students
and even teachers in the school use the internet for studying. For a real
example Ms.Nita is my math teacher she told us that we shoul bring a laptop or
ipad with a internet, we use the internet for studying math ofcourse and we
don’t use it for playing.
My second agrument is, I disagree
because internet helping the students to find the answers of the questions by
not cheating. And i would like to say that parents want that their child to get
a good score right!, and if the student browsing in internet they got many
knowledge that they doesn’t know yet, so i believe that students can have a
internet access freely.
My third agrument is, I disagree because
students already know how that they can use internet for. Students learn from
their teachers and students know what should they browse and not. Teachers
ofcourse didn’t told their student about the negative of an internet but
teachers told us to avoid the negative things in the internet. So i believe this
is my last argument and so we go to the conclusion.
The conclusion is i disagree with this
motion because internet help us to learns and internet help us to find anykinds
of mattery that we want to know. And i believe that this motion should fall
because students must have the internet access freeely.
