That government should not help subsidy for people who choose unhealthy lifestyle’
Hello guys! Today I will discuss about the motion ‘That government should not help subsidy for people who choose unhealthy lifestyle’. First of all, what is government? According to businessdictionary.com, government is a group of people that governs a community or unit. It sets and administers public policy and exercises executive, political and sovereign power through customs, institutions, and laws within a state. A government can be classified into many types, like democracy, republic, monarchy, aristrocracy, dictatorship, etc. And according to a study in the archieve of internal medicine, an unhealthy lifestyle is defined as a lifestyle where a person engages in activities that are known to be detrimental to one’s health, such as smoking, not exercising regulary or enough, eating unhealthy foods on a regular basis, and not mantaining a healty weight. An un healthy lifestyle can vary by degrees, and some may determine that being slighty un healthy is acceptable for the sake of quality of life.
I agree with this motion because human must choose bad or good habbits. If they choose unhealthy lifestyle, they will bring so many bad impacts for their life even other people, for example if the smoker smoke the cigarettes they will get lungs cancer. According to quit.org.au more than 80% of cases of lungs cancer are due to smoking. Cigarette smoke contains many chemicals that interfere with the body’s method of filtering air and cleaning out the lungs. The smoke irritates the lungs and lead to over production of mucus. And for the passive smoker or people who does’nt smoke but they get smoke from the smoker, they will get cancer, and it so dangerouse to our health and can lead to death.
The unhealthy people should not help by the government’s subsidy, they hurt other people, example like smoking it hurts people around them by the smoke, drug race by hit people without any awareness. The unhealthy person just hurt themselve even other people. Government should just give subsidy to a person with a healthy lifestyle. If the government give the subsidy to people who live unhealthy, they will do even worst unhealthy thing and the government just subsidy it. So the subsidy that given to the unhealthy people is just a waste. The healthy person would like to put trash in their place so, the country or the nation will be clean and free of disaster like flood, land slide, etc. If we live healthy the disease will decrease because the germ doesnt like clean and neat place. There so much advantages if the government give the subsidy to the healthy lifestyle people and so many disadvantages if the subsidy is given to unhealthy lifestyle people.
Unhealthy is same as bad habbit, it can bring us to bad future. If we live unhealthy when we were young like eating junk food, in the future we will get obesity. And so many bad impacts beside getting obesity, like diabetes for eating too much sweets. Junk food can damage our liver and our heart because we eat so many fat and sodium that contained inside the junk food. And if we smoke the atmosphere will be thinner and the sunlight will more scorching, and the ice in the pole will melt and penguins and polar bear will be extinct because they lose their habitat. There so much bad impacts if the government give the subsidy to unhealthy people.
So, in my conclusion people who live unhealthy will bring so many bad impacts that can causes to other people and themselves. Unhealthy person is same as bad habbit and will impact to the future. So, I really support this motion and I believed that this statement should stand.
Thank You
