That goverment should not give subsidy to people that choose unhealty lifestyle.
Definnition -Hovernment: The group of people with the authority to govern a country or state.
-Subsidy: A sum of money granted by the state or a public.
-Life style: A life that a person choose.
Argument :I disagree to this statement because people or a person has a right to have a good life, they should have a home, food, and of course a money. This statement given to a people that poor. Of course they don’t have money or a job so subsidy is given to them. They can use it to eat and also buy something useful for them. Now we talking about the people that choose unhealty lifestyle, if the government want the people have a good life style the goverment can teach them or advice them to do a good habit. Of course they will understand, for example if many people throw a rubish to a river. And come a flood of course. So the people or the goverment should teach them to throw it to the trash can.
On http://www.economicshelp.org/. It says.
Subsidies is good for externalities like health, care they can use the subsidy to pay the medicine or the doctor .
Collecting refused and litter, if litter is picked up it benefits everyone else who can eEducation. If the long-term structurally unemployed workers gain useful training and education, it enables them to find work. njoy a more beautiful environment. It also helps improve public health.
By : Muhammad Nur Prayoga
