That we should ban homework
Before we start the points and examples, ill define the motion
What is homework? A homework is a work that the student do on their home
I disagree with this motion because it can make students be stupid and underestimating the work that the teacher gives.
Okay to my points and future impacts:
1) we need home works because if we don’t our score will be bad and even though “the kid” was the smartest kid there and then people will ask how does he get good scores and then he answers because of the homework
2) future impacts of banning home works is so many so I will give some future impact
first ,If the kid doesn’t been given homework they will get dumb or stupider than a guy who only go to primary school and then quit, and then second maybe some students had mastered some subjects but if they were not been given any homework again their knowledge will be gone and be useless because of the underestimating home works
3) ok my last but not least points is, if students don’t get homework,and they doesn’t even know the subjects and then suddenly there is an sudden assessment that makes the deciding which is he/she going to the next grade and it needs good scores if not they will stay on their current grades
In conclusion, I believe that this motion should fall because if there is no home works students will get bad scores except the students who done all the home works
I guess this is the end bye :D
That government should not give subsidy to people who
choose unhealthy lifestyle
Before we start, I’ll define the motion. subsidy what is subsidy?
A subsidy is
a benefit given by the government to groups or individuals usually in the form
of a cash payment or tax reduction.
What is lifestyle? A way of living of individuals, families
(households), and societies, which they manifest in coping with their physical,
psychological, social,etc
Ok, my reason is
I disagree with this motion because imagine if you saw a guy who is smoking cigarette and then he got lung cancer
and then he gets subsidy .
And then someone noticed that and then he will
say “hey why he’s been given subsidy but us was not be given subsidy”
My points
(1 if
they been given subsidy the people who chooses the unhealthy lifestyle got
subsidy because they were making themselves sick weak
Example: they’re
smoking cigarette and then they got stroke or cancer
(2 and on some towns I’ve
seen then smoking cocain and then the police doesn't notice that and then many
years later they got stroke and then they got subsidy
My rebuttal: many people said that everybody
should be given subsidy I agree
with this
But on this case I
disagree because drugs,cigarettes,etc that is make our organs broken because it
has bad side effects like u sing drugs youll get stroke,cancer,impotence.
So bye guys I
think this is the end.
