That we supports home schooling
Earth is the only planet that consist of living things. People is one of the living things. People need each other to live that’s why people called by social living things. We need to work with the other people.We can help them and they can help us. For making a good bond with people we have to make friends. We need to make friends since young,so,we will know how to make friends in the future.We can get friends everywhere even when we go to the toilet in the mall we also can make friends.Making friends are easier in the school.In school of course we really need friends to discuss,play,etc.With this motion,that we supports home schooling will obstruct people especially for children.So,in this writing,I belive that this statement should fall.
Based on http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary ,supports mean “to agree with or approve of (someone or something)” while home schooling is “to teach your children at home instead of sending them to a school”.For me,going to public school is better than homeschooling.Here I got 4 reason which are:the cost,socialization,experience and motivation.( http://www.middleschool.net )
First,in cost sector.Of course homeschooling need a big cost.For the book,board,etc.Cost is not only for tools but also for the teacher.Homeschooling teachers need more cost because homeschooling teacher don’t have any friend to talk with and also the teacher need to come to our house.That made the cost even bigger.It is very different like the things in public school.The cost in public school is cheaper than the homeschooling.The impact of the cost choosing homeschooling than public school is that the money is useless only for paying an expensive but not good enough.It is better to buy something for children like toys,games,etc than give them education by homeschooling.
Second,in socialization sector. Home schooled children may not have as many opportunities to interact with other children in comparison to children who attend regular schools.School’s goal is for build a social setting and also to study.So,children are better to go to public school than homeschooling.Most of the home schooled children become anti in social when they grow up.If children,the next generation become anti social,how can they work?How can they talk with other people freely?How can they act natural when they meet other people?They can’t do all of that.Because we were thought in our school.In public school,they also teach us about manners while homeschooling only thought the children about academic things not sociality.Home schooled children often get Sociophobia which is afreaid with sociality.
Third,is about the children experience.In public school there is many outside activity.Students in public school having fun and studying also outdoor while homeschooling only thought indoor.Homeschooling do not make any memorable experience because they only study in the house and do not go anywhere.Most of public school give the student chance to study in the other place even in the other country.The example is my school,SDIA 35 give the student chance to study in the other country such as Bangkok and Singapore.That makes the children or students get memorable experience.Home schooled children sometimes also feel like they were in prison which they can’t go anywhere.So,still for me it’s better to choose public school than homeschooling.
Fourth,in motivation sector.Children really like a gift or present.That’s why,now there are so many competition for children to gain a present.The meaning by motivation thing is to push the children to join competition and gain present.By winning a competition,children not only get a present but also medals,troophies,etc.By joining the competition also make the children smart.The proof is Parsa Nayyara.She joined so many competition sinceshe were in the 2nd grade.And now,she always got the 1st rank in the class.Competition make us know worldwide knowledge.All public school on the world participate in many competition,while homeschooling is rare to make their student to participating a competition.Because many competition are in group.The example of competition which is in group is WSC.1 group consist of 3 members.Me my self,I join WSC competition with 2 of my friends who are Nayyara and Naila.So,it is hard to joining competition for home schooled children because many competitions are in group and most of homeschooled children become anti social.
The future impact of joining homeschooling than public school is that the children which are home schooled children will get hard to get their job.Because,since they were a children,they only talk with their home schooled teacher not with the other same-old children.To get a job they must introduce them self and must be good for cooperating with other people while home schooled children never cooperate with other children in organization.In public school,there are some organization for the students.The example is OSIS in Indonesia.Student cooperate with other student in OSIS. By joining an organization will give the knowledge to cooperate in the future.
In conclusion,homeschooling only teach about academic lesson not manners.homeschooling do not give us a lesson how to cooperate with other people and also do not give us memorable experience and challenge to join competition.Once again I believe that this statement should fall.Thank you.
That government should not give help subsidy for people who choose unhealthy lifestyle
Many people in this world effected by globalisation. Globalisation brings good and bad things.The good things or impact is that people will get information easier,but the bad impact is that people can make a bad habit or bad/unhealthy lifestyle.A subsidy is a benefit given by the government to groups or individuals usually in the form of a cash payment or tax reduction.This motion means that government should not give relief pay something.I agree and I believe that this statement should stand.
I agree because by not giving any relief or subsidy to people who choose unhealthy lifestyle can motivate them to make them realize that it is better for us to choose healthy lifestyle.And also unhealthy lifestyle also bring us to disaster such as sickness,craziness and or even death.Based on https://www.cardiosmart.org/news-and-events/2015/01/dramatic-impact-of-unhealthy-lifestyle-on-heart-health unhealthy lifestyle especially for smoking can brought us to death.The proof is one of American girl which her age is around 20 die because of unhealthy lifestyle.
The future impact by not giving subsidy to people who choose unhealthy lifestyle is positive future.Subsidy is for fuel oil.And almost everyone in this world need that.And now,especially in Indonesia,the tax of fuel oil increase.Of course people didn't want that,because they still need the other things to complete their live.By subsidy,which give a relief for people will help them.So,if the government give regulation that people with unhealthy lifestyle doesn't get any subsidy,so the people will try to use healthy lifestyle.If all people choose healthy lifestyle,of course human population will increase and doesn't decrease because,as I told you before,unhealthy lifestyle could kill people.With people who choose healthy lifestyle will make human population increase because there will be few death.And also,if human population increase,that will effect the social impact to people.People will be friendlier because there will be many people to be our friend.
In conclusion by not giving subsidy for people who choose unhealthy lifestyle will impact good or positive impact in the future like people population will increase.That also motivate people to choose a healthy lifestyle because fuel oil needed for us to live.So,once again I believe that this statement should stand.Thank you.
